Shareholder agreements serve a valuable role in tightly managed and private companies. Ideally, people who do business together will always agree on how they can manage this business, both on a day-to-day basis and at the presentation of important events. Similarly, it is hoped that all shareholders will agree and that they will be fair to each other if one of them wants to sell. History shows that this is often not the case, even among family members. While a well-crafted shareholder pact cannot prevent the bad blood that sometimes occurs between shareholders, it can at least help them deal with difficult situations and ensure an orderly divorce if necessary.  For the simple discussion, I will call for both shareholder agreements for capital companies and enterprise agreements for shareholder agreements. Similarly, I will refer to both shareholders and shareholders as shareholders. It is important to note that once the company increases VC`s financing, each shareholder pact will be replaced by a new set of agreements requested by investors. So make sure you don`t make an agreement that can`t be changed at the time of funding, or you might get stuck. An example of this would be if the agreement requires all parties to accept a change, but one of the founding parties left the company before funding and is not cooperative. An investment agreement and a shareholders` pact are two often confusing legal documents, often used by large and small businesses. The distinction between the two allows you to fully integrate the investment efforts of new shareholders and consolidate the ownership rights of your company. Another protection for minorities is the ability of shareholders to maintain their proportional interest in the corporation if the board issues new equity.
In short, this right allows the shareholder to purchase additional capital at the price offered to other shareholders or to third parties. As a general rule, this right does not apply with compensation awarded to employees or a signed member of the public. This right may be granted in situations where the shareholder has the right to veto the possibility for the board of directors to issue new equity. In this context, we believe that the approval of the general meeting of shareholders should require strengthened majorities: structural changes and changes in the social capital of the creation (increases and reductions in capital), any changes to the governing body or statutes, the dissolution and liquidation of the company, the distribution of dividends and the realization of investments or the arrival of charges on an amount deemed relevant. To avoid a reduction in the fund`s share, there are two ways to regulate its protection in a shareholder pact. The first and most common route is to include a clause that regulates a preferential right for the acquisition of new shares, granted to shareholders who, at the time of the creation of the new shares, are part of the start-up`s share capital at the time of the creation of the new shares through a capital increase in future investment rounds.